<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Men Be Hoes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/</link>
	<description>Love Advice Will Never Be The Same...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:58:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laidé</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20338</link>
		<dc:creator>Laidé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20338</guid>
		<description>and not have sx with everything with a hole***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and not have sx with everything with a hole***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laidé</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20337</link>
		<dc:creator>Laidé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20337</guid>
		<description>All men are hoes. That&#039;s why it was never up for discussion. Men offer their bodies like Dunkin Donuts offers free samples of sugar packets. I can get those anywhere just like I can get sex from a man anywhere, which unfortunately makes you guys insignificant and worth absolutely nothing...like those sugar packets. I would be honored to meet a man who actually values his body and have sex with everything with a hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All men are hoes. That&#8217;s why it was never up for discussion. Men offer their bodies like Dunkin Donuts offers free samples of sugar packets. I can get those anywhere just like I can get sex from a man anywhere, which unfortunately makes you guys insignificant and worth absolutely nothing&#8230;like those sugar packets. I would be honored to meet a man who actually values his body and have sex with everything with a hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bane</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20336</link>
		<dc:creator>Bane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20336</guid>
		<description>I think that what the argument proves is that men are essentially all &#039;hoes&#039; which tends to render the term meaningless whereas only a certain subset of women are &#039;hoes&#039; which allows for a distinction (for good or ill) between them and women who are not &#039;hoes&#039;.

In other words, both men and women have to be willing for sex to happen (outside of being forced).  In fact, this is even more true for men - a woman can get bored and start to watch TV while still technically having sex.  Unless you&#039;re 17 or using medication a guy who loses focus and decides to watch TV generally won&#039;t be successful at continuing to have sex, even technically.

So if both have to choose to have sex then the only real difference (based on the author&#039;s arguments) is that men will basically ALWAYS choose it whereas women will actually exercise some judgement.  Which means there is basically non such thing as a non-hoe man so the term is functionally meaningless.  The only difference between men is how successful or unsuccessful different men are at achieving their hoeness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that what the argument proves is that men are essentially all &#8216;hoes&#8217; which tends to render the term meaningless whereas only a certain subset of women are &#8216;hoes&#8217; which allows for a distinction (for good or ill) between them and women who are not &#8216;hoes&#8217;.</p>
<p>In other words, both men and women have to be willing for sex to happen (outside of being forced).  In fact, this is even more true for men &#8211; a woman can get bored and start to watch TV while still technically having sex.  Unless you&#8217;re 17 or using medication a guy who loses focus and decides to watch TV generally won&#8217;t be successful at continuing to have sex, even technically.</p>
<p>So if both have to choose to have sex then the only real difference (based on the author&#8217;s arguments) is that men will basically ALWAYS choose it whereas women will actually exercise some judgement.  Which means there is basically non such thing as a non-hoe man so the term is functionally meaningless.  The only difference between men is how successful or unsuccessful different men are at achieving their hoeness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cronos</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20335</link>
		<dc:creator>Cronos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20335</guid>
		<description>im surprised that we consider sex or the act of it being morally wrong or the person who gets it easy having no values. like being a whore(when applied to women) was just a way for men and also women to put other women down to control and manipulate them (to mess with the competition sexually)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im surprised that we consider sex or the act of it being morally wrong or the person who gets it easy having no values. like being a whore(when applied to women) was just a way for men and also women to put other women down to control and manipulate them (to mess with the competition sexually)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanj</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20334</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20334</guid>
		<description>Hell yeah, men can be hoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell yeah, men can be hoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YoungBrothas</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20333</link>
		<dc:creator>YoungBrothas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20333</guid>
		<description>Guys can definitely be hoes. Some of us are the epitome of the word lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys can definitely be hoes. Some of us are the epitome of the word lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LadyMack</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20332</link>
		<dc:creator>LadyMack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20332</guid>
		<description>I agree with the following statement &quot;a man can stick it anywhere can not be excused from not being called a hoe&quot;

To add to that.  I think it&#039;s stupid to label women or men.  We&#039;re all adults, we all have sex, what&#039;s the fucking big deal?  Why do we need to label anything or make it negative.  There is nothing wrong with sex, both parties are consenting to it, and therefore both parties are letting that pleasure happen.  It&#039;s okay.  Be adults.  Have sex.  As long as you are loving and respecting your sexy ass bodies by using a condom, why are we all hung up on labeling or justifying it?  Men and women alike are players and hoes.  No gender is above the other.  If you&#039;re gonna fuck, then fuck and stop debating.  Just do it!
&quot;Hoe&quot; as directed at women has a negative connotation. That when women do it, its wrong.  That&#039;s stupid.  If it&#039;s two people knocking boots and they both want it, they&#039;re just grown folks enjoying the natural act of sex.  Big fucking deal.  And the only time I have experienced a man calling a woman a hoe was all out of anger because that woman didn&#039;t want him.  He got rejected by that one woman.  Move on.

Can everybody just enjoy sex without making one gender better than the other or more allowed to enjoy sex freely than the other.  Let&#039;s all just grow up. Stop punishing the act of sex or making it negative. Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the following statement &#8220;a man can stick it anywhere can not be excused from not being called a hoe&#8221;</p>
<p>To add to that.  I think it&#8217;s stupid to label women or men.  We&#8217;re all adults, we all have sex, what&#8217;s the fucking big deal?  Why do we need to label anything or make it negative.  There is nothing wrong with sex, both parties are consenting to it, and therefore both parties are letting that pleasure happen.  It&#8217;s okay.  Be adults.  Have sex.  As long as you are loving and respecting your sexy ass bodies by using a condom, why are we all hung up on labeling or justifying it?  Men and women alike are players and hoes.  No gender is above the other.  If you&#8217;re gonna fuck, then fuck and stop debating.  Just do it!<br />
&#8220;Hoe&#8221; as directed at women has a negative connotation. That when women do it, its wrong.  That&#8217;s stupid.  If it&#8217;s two people knocking boots and they both want it, they&#8217;re just grown folks enjoying the natural act of sex.  Big fucking deal.  And the only time I have experienced a man calling a woman a hoe was all out of anger because that woman didn&#8217;t want him.  He got rejected by that one woman.  Move on.</p>
<p>Can everybody just enjoy sex without making one gender better than the other or more allowed to enjoy sex freely than the other.  Let&#8217;s all just grow up. Stop punishing the act of sex or making it negative. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dash</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20331</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20331</guid>
		<description>Spoken like a true hoe. This post&#039;s only valid point was how it is ultimately a woman&#039;s decision to allow sex to happen. Very true. The woman would be classified as a hoe if she decides to give it up to anything with a penis. But what about the man sticking it in anything with a hole? This promiscuous habit indicates you have no standards and no self-respect. A man is not exempt from that. This is the amoral mentality that allows uneducated men to think they can get away with this kind of behacior scot-free. You don&#039;t like the word hoe? Ok then let&#039;s use scumbag. You think any woman with standards would want a dirty bird that has sex with any and every woman that offers? I think not. This weak argument that &quot;men think about sex all the time&quot; is tired. And so is this rationalization of being a scumbag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoken like a true hoe. This post&#8217;s only valid point was how it is ultimately a woman&#8217;s decision to allow sex to happen. Very true. The woman would be classified as a hoe if she decides to give it up to anything with a penis. But what about the man sticking it in anything with a hole? This promiscuous habit indicates you have no standards and no self-respect. A man is not exempt from that. This is the amoral mentality that allows uneducated men to think they can get away with this kind of behacior scot-free. You don&#8217;t like the word hoe? Ok then let&#8217;s use scumbag. You think any woman with standards would want a dirty bird that has sex with any and every woman that offers? I think not. This weak argument that &#8220;men think about sex all the time&#8221; is tired. And so is this rationalization of being a scumbag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NaturalLy Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20330</link>
		<dc:creator>NaturalLy Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20330</guid>
		<description>@Bella.....that was right on point ! i hope mR. Haynes3 ready up on the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bella&#8230;..that was right on point ! i hope mR. Haynes3 ready up on the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carisa</title>
		<link>http://www.flyguychronicles.com/2009/12/can-men-be-hoes/#comment-20329</link>
		<dc:creator>Carisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyguychronicles.com/?p=4664#comment-20329</guid>
		<description>Promiscuous or a hoe male, female it is all the same when it comes down to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Promiscuous or a hoe male, female it is all the same when it comes down to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

